Work Organization and Social Responsibility on Digital Platforms: Challenges and Best Practices in Europe
Volume 03 Issue 1
Authors
Rita Remeikienė, Ligita Gasparėnienė, Jolita Česiulytė
Keywords
platform work, digitalization, corporate social responsibility, labor rights, regulatory challenges, collective bargaining
Citation in APA style
Remeikienė, R., Gasparėnienė, L., & Česiulytė, J. (2025). Work Organization and Social Responsibility on Digital Platforms: Challenges and Best Practices in Europe. Journal of Business Sectors, 3(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.62222/TDGY8465
DOI
Abstract
Research background:
Digital platforms have reshaped labor markets by introducing flexible work models such as crowdwork, gig work, and outsourcing. These models create economic opportunities but also legal uncertainties regarding employment status, workers’ rights, and regulatory oversight. While previous research has largely focused on platform workers, less attention has been given to platform managers' role in fair labor practices and corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Purpose of the article:
This study examines the organization and management of work on digital platforms, focusing on regulatory challenges, employment ambiguities, and CSR in platform labor practices. Additionally, it analyzes best practices from European platforms that integrate social dialogue, enhance worker protection, and improve compliance with labor laws.
Methods:
The research employs systematic and comparative literature analysis to evaluate studies on platform work, focusing on legal issues and CSR in digital labor markets. It reviews European legal frameworks, particularly Directive (EU) 2024/2831 and the Digital Services Act, to assess their impact on platform governance. Furthermore, it conducts an empirical analysis of good practices, highlighting cases of collective bargaining and social responsibility initiatives in European platforms. By comparing regulatory approaches and corporate initiatives, this study identifies key factors contributing to fairer labor conditions in the platform economy.
Findings & Value added:
Digital platforms operate in legal “grey zones,” allowing them to bypass labor laws and limit worker protections. Many platforms fail to ensure fair wages, social security, and transparent communication, while algorithmic management raises concerns over worker autonomy. Collective bargaining and social dialogue have proven effective in improving conditions, with Austria, Denmark, and Sweden securing better wages through formal agreements. Spain’s enforcement against Glovo highlights the necessity of legal intervention, as voluntary measures alone are insufficient. Germany’s worker-led cooperatives offer an alternative model, strengthening worker bargaining power. However, regulatory fragmentation across the EU leads to unequal protections. Social dialogue and legal enforcement must be combined to balance flexibility with fair labor conditions.